David Sterman has worked as an investment analyst for nearly two decades. He started his Wall Street career in equity research at Smith Barney, culminating in a position as Senior Analyst covering European banks. While at Smith Barney, he learned of all the tricks used by Wall Street to steer the best advice to their top clients and their own trading desk. David has also served as Managing Editor at TheStreet.com and Director of Research at Individual Investor. In addition, David worked as Director of Research for Jesup & Lamont Securities. David has made numerous media appearances over the years, primarily on CNBC and Bloomberg TV, and has a master's degree in management from Georgia Tech. David Stermanon

Analyst Articles

For many dividend-paying stocks, it appears as if a “great rotation” has begun. One of the most lucrative investing themes of the past few years may be coming to an end as interest rates start to rise, heightening the relative appeal of fixed-income assets compared with riskier equities. The question for investors: As others start to flee, how can you know when it’s time to go against the… Read More

For many dividend-paying stocks, it appears as if a “great rotation” has begun. One of the most lucrative investing themes of the past few years may be coming to an end as interest rates start to rise, heightening the relative appeal of fixed-income assets compared with riskier equities. The question for investors: As others start to flee, how can you know when it’s time to go against the grain and load up on dividend-paying stocks?#-ad_banner-# Let’s be clear: Not all investors think we’re on the cusp of a sea change in interest rates. The global economy remains quite weak, with Europe stumbling to find an economic floor and China showing increasing signs of weakness. As long as the global economy is in a funk, some strategists expect that U.S. investors will continue to benefit from an environment of ultra-low interest rates. A few have suggested that… Read More

As investors were picking up the pieces after the dot-com implosion, they came across another troubled sector. A series of looming patent expirations on key drugs meant that major pharmaceutical companies were on the cusp of a decade-long sales drought. Investors responded by dumping shares, as the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index plunged from 400 in late 2001 to just 250 a… Read More

As investors were picking up the pieces after the dot-com implosion, they came across another troubled sector. A series of looming patent expirations on key drugs meant that major pharmaceutical companies were on the cusp of a decade-long sales drought. Investors responded by dumping shares, as the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index plunged from 400 in late 2001 to just 250 a year later. A decade later, Big Pharma’s “patent cliff” was still a key concern, and this index remained far from its previous highs. Yet in recent quarters, Big Pharma has come back with a vengeance, as shares have moved back to the levels seen all those years ago. Credit goes to several factors, most notably the absence of any new imminent blockbuster-drug patent expirations, and an industrywide focus on shareholder-friendly moves such as share… Read More

As investors were picking up the pieces after the dot-com implosion, they came across another troubled sector. A series of looming patent expirations on key drugs meant that major pharmaceutical companies were on the cusp of a decade-long sales drought. Investors responded by dumping shares, as the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index plunged from 400 in late 2001 to just 250 a… Read More

As investors were picking up the pieces after the dot-com implosion, they came across another troubled sector. A series of looming patent expirations on key drugs meant that major pharmaceutical companies were on the cusp of a decade-long sales drought. Investors responded by dumping shares, as the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index plunged from 400 in late 2001 to just 250 a year later. A decade later, Big Pharma’s “patent cliff” was still a key concern, and this index remained far from its previous highs. Yet in recent quarters, Big Pharma has come back with a vengeance, as shares have moved back to the levels seen all those years ago. Credit goes to several factors, most notably the absence of any new imminent blockbuster-drug patent expirations, and an industrywide focus on shareholder-friendly moves such as share… Read More

As investors were picking up the pieces after the dot-com implosion, they came across another troubled sector. A series of looming patent expirations on key drugs meant that major pharmaceutical companies were on the cusp of a decade-long sales drought. Investors responded by dumping shares, as the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index plunged from 400 in late 2001 to just 250 a… Read More

As investors were picking up the pieces after the dot-com implosion, they came across another troubled sector. A series of looming patent expirations on key drugs meant that major pharmaceutical companies were on the cusp of a decade-long sales drought. Investors responded by dumping shares, as the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index plunged from 400 in late 2001 to just 250 a year later. A decade later, Big Pharma’s “patent cliff” was still a key concern, and this index remained far from its previous highs. Yet in recent quarters, Big Pharma has come back with a vengeance, as shares have moved back to the levels seen all those years ago. Credit goes to several factors, most notably the absence of any new imminent blockbuster-drug patent expirations, and an industrywide focus on shareholder-friendly moves such as share… Read More

As investors were picking up the pieces after the dot-com implosion, they came across another troubled sector. A series of looming patent expirations on key drugs meant that major pharmaceutical companies were on the cusp of a decade-long sales drought. Investors responded by dumping shares, as the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index plunged from 400 in late 2001 to just 250 a… Read More

As investors were picking up the pieces after the dot-com implosion, they came across another troubled sector. A series of looming patent expirations on key drugs meant that major pharmaceutical companies were on the cusp of a decade-long sales drought. Investors responded by dumping shares, as the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index plunged from 400 in late 2001 to just 250 a year later. A decade later, Big Pharma’s “patent cliff” was still a key concern, and this index remained far from its previous highs. Yet in recent quarters, Big Pharma has come back with a vengeance, as shares have moved back to the levels seen all those years ago. Credit goes to several factors, most notably the absence of any new imminent blockbuster-drug patent expirations, and an industrywide focus on shareholder-friendly moves such as share… Read More

As investors were picking up the pieces after the dot-com implosion, they came across another troubled sector. A series of looming patent expirations on key drugs meant that major pharmaceutical companies were on the cusp of a decade-long sales drought. Investors responded by dumping shares, as the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index plunged from 400 in late 2001 to just 250 a… Read More

As investors were picking up the pieces after the dot-com implosion, they came across another troubled sector. A series of looming patent expirations on key drugs meant that major pharmaceutical companies were on the cusp of a decade-long sales drought. Investors responded by dumping shares, as the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index plunged from 400 in late 2001 to just 250 a year later. A decade later, Big Pharma’s “patent cliff” was still a key concern, and this index remained far from its previous highs. Yet in recent quarters, Big Pharma has come back with a vengeance, as shares have moved back to the levels seen all those years ago. Credit goes to several factors, most notably the absence of any new imminent blockbuster-drug patent expirations, and an industrywide focus on shareholder-friendly moves such as share… Read More

As investors were picking up the pieces after the dot-com implosion, they came across another troubled sector. A series of looming patent expirations on key drugs meant that major pharmaceutical companies were on the cusp of a decade-long sales drought. Investors responded by dumping shares, as the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index plunged from 400 in late 2001 to just 250 a… Read More

As investors were picking up the pieces after the dot-com implosion, they came across another troubled sector. A series of looming patent expirations on key drugs meant that major pharmaceutical companies were on the cusp of a decade-long sales drought. Investors responded by dumping shares, as the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index plunged from 400 in late 2001 to just 250 a year later. A decade later, Big Pharma’s “patent cliff” was still a key concern, and this index remained far from its previous highs. Yet in recent quarters, Big Pharma has come back with a vengeance, as shares have moved back to the levels seen all those years ago. Credit goes to several factors, most notably the absence of any new imminent blockbuster-drug patent expirations, and an industrywide focus on shareholder-friendly moves such as share… Read More

As investors were picking up the pieces after the dot-com implosion, they came across another troubled sector. A series of looming patent expirations on key drugs meant that major pharmaceutical companies were on the cusp of a decade-long sales drought. Investors responded by dumping shares, as the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index plunged from 400 in late 2001 to just 250 a… Read More

As investors were picking up the pieces after the dot-com implosion, they came across another troubled sector. A series of looming patent expirations on key drugs meant that major pharmaceutical companies were on the cusp of a decade-long sales drought. Investors responded by dumping shares, as the AMEX Pharmaceutical Index plunged from 400 in late 2001 to just 250 a year later. A decade later, Big Pharma’s “patent cliff” was still a key concern, and this index remained far from its previous highs. Yet in recent quarters, Big Pharma has come back with a vengeance, as shares have moved back to the levels seen all those years ago. Credit goes to several factors, most notably the absence of any new imminent blockbuster-drug patent expirations, and an industrywide focus on shareholder-friendly moves such as share… Read More

Investing in semiconductor stocks can be quite challenging. Many of them languish for a long time — even as operations clearly improve — until suddenly, investors begin singing the company’s praises. That’s why I suggested investors stay the course with memory-chip maker Micron Technology (Nasdaq: MU). That patience has been rewarded, as Micron is now on the top of many “buy” lists and making a run for the $12 mark, after having more than doubled over the past… Read More

Investing in semiconductor stocks can be quite challenging. Many of them languish for a long time — even as operations clearly improve — until suddenly, investors begin singing the company’s praises. That’s why I suggested investors stay the course with memory-chip maker Micron Technology (Nasdaq: MU). That patience has been rewarded, as Micron is now on the top of many “buy” lists and making a run for the $12 mark, after having more than doubled over the past year. Although Micron may have a bit more upside, I prefer to focus on chipmakers that still suffer from very low expectations, even as their business starts to get stronger. Right now, that’s the backdrop for ON Semiconductor (Nasdaq: ONNN), which has integrated a series of recent acquisitions and is poised to generate robust free cash flow in the years ahead. Diversity Is A Virtue One of the reasons that you may have never heard of this company,… Read More