If you listen to the talking heads on CNBC, gold’s move from $1,230/oz. to $1,280/oz. since last December occurred despite the threat of at least one, and possibly two, interest rate hikes in 2017. This reasoning has resulted in the idea that gold prices will have to decline from current levels unless the Fed fails to raise interest rates. And frankly, unless the United States enters a recession, the likelihood of at least one more rate increase in 2017 is inevitable. #-ad_banner-#But are the talking heads correct? I don’t think so. Here’s why… Gold prices correlate more to ‘real’ interest… Read More
If you listen to the talking heads on CNBC, gold’s move from $1,230/oz. to $1,280/oz. since last December occurred despite the threat of at least one, and possibly two, interest rate hikes in 2017. This reasoning has resulted in the idea that gold prices will have to decline from current levels unless the Fed fails to raise interest rates. And frankly, unless the United States enters a recession, the likelihood of at least one more rate increase in 2017 is inevitable. #-ad_banner-#But are the talking heads correct? I don’t think so. Here’s why… Gold prices correlate more to ‘real’ interest rates than to ‘nominal’ rates. Real interest rates are nominal rates less the rate of inflation. In simple terms, a nominal interest rate of 3% yields a real rate of 1% if the inflation rate is 2%. Now, nominal interest rates are likely to rise in 2017. But real rates are not, since expectations are for higher inflation, not less. What this means is that even if the Fed attempts to ‘normalize’ them, real interest rates have likely already hit their highs — meaning that gold prices are not likely to go significantly lower from here. In fact, given… Read More