It seems like it should be a fairly straightforward concept. You invest your money in a company for a share of future earnings. Most of the companies in which I invest have been around for longer than I have, so those earnings should be fairly stable, if not following a gradual path higher. Of course, investing can be anything but simple as the market charts its course through the new normal and you are trying to avoid the next historic crash in prices. #-ad_banner-#So when someone starts talking about ‘simple’ math that makes an investment a no-brainer, I start to… Read More
It seems like it should be a fairly straightforward concept. You invest your money in a company for a share of future earnings. Most of the companies in which I invest have been around for longer than I have, so those earnings should be fairly stable, if not following a gradual path higher. Of course, investing can be anything but simple as the market charts its course through the new normal and you are trying to avoid the next historic crash in prices. #-ad_banner-#So when someone starts talking about ‘simple’ math that makes an investment a no-brainer, I start to wonder how simple it can really be. Especially when that someone is the CEO of the company. That was the case recently during an earnings release by one of the world’s largest asset managers. Not only is the lecturing mathematician the CEO, he’s also the co-founder of the company. I admire this CEO greatly and he’s a guru in the world of private equity, but when I looked further into the details I found a few holes in his ‘simple’ math. While I don’t agree with the CEO’s math, I did find evidence that the stock could be one of… Read More