The Simple Math Proves That Anyone Can Build Wealth In The Market
We live in a world that’s constantly begging for our attention. And unfortunately, due to how our brains are wired, we’re usually all too happy to oblige.
For the majority of human history, man’s primary concern has been his next meal. After all, it’s hard to think 10 or 20 years down the road when there might be a predator lurking around the next turn.
In this way, shorter-term thinking has helped us survive. Call it an evolutionary imperative if you will… But if you want to build true, lasting wealth, then it’s much more vital that you think ahead.
Fortunately, there’s a way to do this without overthinking it. There are no secrets, no gimmicks, and it certainly doesn’t require an advanced degree in physics to figure it out.
So what is it? Two things: time and compound interest.
For the past few weeks, my colleague Nathan Slaughter, Chief Strategist of High-Yield Investing, has been delivering a simple but important message.
Nathan’s longtime followers know that it’s actually the same lesson he’s been saying for years…
Successful investing doesn’t have to be complicated. If you can find just a handful of solid dividend payers and simply let compounding and dividend reinvestment do their job, then the rest will take care of itself.
This concept may not be as exciting as discussing bitcoin or meme stocks or the latest developments in Washington, but it’s just as true as it’s ever been.
In the column below, Nathan goes into further detail about the simple but powerful math behind this. Once you see it, it’s hard to unsee. Because as Nathan will explain, while some of us may not have 25 years or more, the good news is that we can achieve some impressive results in just 10 years or less…
A Primer On Compounding
You might already know that blue-chip dividend-paying stocks have provided the bulk of the market’s return over time. But many younger workers make the mistake of taking their dividend payments in cash. Many don’t realize that simply reinvesting those quarterly checks could easily put an extra $125,000 in their account by retirement age.
Let me quickly show you how powerful compounding can be…
If history is any guide, you can expect your investments to grow about 6% to 8% annually over the long-haul. A 6% gain on a $50,000 portfolio may not seem like much, but 6% year after year on an ever-rising base of assets starts to really snowball. That’s compounding. You may tend to think of it more with respect to savings accounts or other interest-bearing items, but it also works with dividends.
For example…
Suppose you set aside $6,000 this year (I’m assuming you’re 40 years old in this example). That money will earn $360 in 12 months, assuming the aforementioned 6% rate. In year two, you will earn 6% again, but on $6,360, rather than $6,000. That’s right, your interest itself begins to earn interest.
Assuming you keep contributing $6,000 to your account each year, here’s how your money would grow. Keep it up for five years, and you’ve bagged $3,800 in gains in addition to the $30,000 you’ve put in.
A Decent Gain | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age: | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 |
Balance: | $6,000 | $12,360 | $19,102 | $26,248 | $33,823 |
Now let’s say you keep it up for another 10 years, picking up 6% annual gains on the nest egg along with another $6,000 in freshly injected funds each year. Now compounding is really starting to pick up. You’ve put in $90,000 ($6,000 a year times 15 years), but also have a nearly $50,000 gain to show for your efforts.
Getting Better | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age: | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 |
Balance: | $41,852 | $50,363 | $59,385 | $68,948 | $79,085 |
Age: | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 |
Balance: | $89,930 | $101,220 | $113,293 | $126,090 | $139,656 |
The next 10 years, your results are better still. You’ve now put in $150,000 ($6,000 a year times 25 years), but made even more than that in profits. When you’re looking at 6% gains on $300,000, the annual earnings really start to pile up fast.
Better Still | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age: | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
Balance: | $154,035 | $169,277 | $185,434 | $202,560 | $220,714 |
Age: | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 |
Balance: | $239,956 | $260,354 | $281,975 | $304,893 | $329,187 |
And if you stick with it for 10 more years, you’ll now be sitting on a really impressive pile of cash.
Strong Annual Returns | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age: | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 |
Balance: | $354,938 | $382,235 | $411,169 | $441,169 | $474,349 |
Age: | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 |
Balance: | $508,810 | $545,339 | $584,059 | $625,103 | $668,609 |
By the time you hit 74, you’ll be bagging nearly $40,000 in annual gains — far higher than the $6,000 you’ve been injecting each year.
Dividend Reinvestment Is Key
The numbers above, while compelling, are purely a mathematical exercise. In reality, what you are doing is receiving dividend income, using the proceeds to buy more shares. Those shares then generate more income, which leads to even more shares, which leads to more income…
Ben Franklin put it more eloquently, when he said, “The money that money makes, makes more money.”
Suppose you call your broker and place an order for 1,000 shares of XYZ (a reliable dividend payer) at a price of $10 per share, for a total investment of $10,000. The stock offers an annual dividend of $0.50 per share (5.0% yield). So over the next 12 months, you will collect $500 in dividend payments (1,000 shares * $0.50).
You could take the cash and spend it. But that gets you nowhere fast. To truly build wealth, you need to reinvest these distributions, which purchase 50 more shares ($500/$10). So at the end of the first year, your position size would have grown from 1000 shares to 1,050 shares. And here’s where it gets fun.
In the second year, those new 50 shares themselves generate dividend income. And so on.
After 10 years, you will have accumulated 1,628 shares with a value of $16,289. By contrast, if you pocketed the cash instead of reinvesting, you would have the same 1,000 shares you started with, collecting a flat total of $5,000 in dividends along the way – but missing out on $1,289 in gains.
That may not sound like too much. But keep in mind that this hypothetical example assumes zero growth in the stock, zero additional investments, and zero increase in the dividend. So you can imagine the potential with a company whose dividends and shares are steadily growing each year.
Let’s run the same numbers, but assume a longer 25-year time frame, for a 40-year old until retirement age at 65. Let’s also assume that the share price and dividends are both growing 8% a year. Now, let’s see the difference.
Total Dividends Paid | Ending # of Shares | Total Ending Value Including Dividends | |
Without Reinvestment | $39,477 | 1,000 | $107,961 |
With Reinvestment | $89,428 | 3,386 | $231,914 |
As you can see, reinvesting the dividends would put an extra $124,000 in your account – from the exact same stock earning the same annual return.
By retirement, the $0.50 per share annual dividend would have grown to $3.42 per share. And you would be sitting on 3,386 shares, three times the number you started with. That would provide an annual income stream of $11,580 – more dividend income each year than the $10,000 you initially invested. And that’s with only one contribution in the first year, nothing out of pocket thereafter.
Closing Thoughts
I know I just threw out a lot of numbers, but the takeaway here should be pretty clear.
By using time and compounding, anybody can build a sizeable portfolio. And if you think it’s too late for you, then think again…
Remember, we essentially started from scratch in this example. So while you might be older than 40, I’m willing to bet most of you have a bigger portfolio than what we’re talking about here. So while you may not have 25 years or more, the good news is that a few simple tweaks can have you on the right path in relatively little time.
Besides, aside from building a comfortable nest egg, this passive investment strategy has other perks. If nothing else, it means you don’t have to stay glued to the finance channels looking for the next “hot” stock. Nor do you have to pay too much attention to the latest GDP forecast or whatever the Fed is saying.
Of course, this only works with quality businesses paying stable (and ideally rising) dividends. And that’s where my latest research report for High-Yield Investing comes in…
You see, most investors think they have to settle for the low payouts offered in this low-rate environment. After all, the average S&P 500 stock yields less than 2%. But the truth is that the high-yields are out there — if you know where to look…
Each one of the stocks in my latest report yields more than 5% right now… All of them have proven track records… In fact, they’re some of the strongest, most reliable, and generous income payers I’ve ever seen… Each one has delivered outstanding long-term returns, and I have little continue to do so for years to come.